Conversation
stubs never really moved beyond proof-of-concept. E.g. there is no cmake support for them, and the one app that uses them has no build. This PR removes them entirely. Opened for discussion. Co-authored-by: Claude Code <noreply@anthropic.com>
alexreinking
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
In principle, I agree with this change. It removes a source of extreme complexity with no users. Almost 2000 lines removed is a remarkable metric. We should probably send a notice to the mailing list, in case anyone there is reading and cares to weigh in.
|
This PR should also drop the |
# Conflicts: # src/Module.h
|
This PR should probably drop the Python equivalent (Pystubs), too. |
|
@vksnk is this going to break anything inside Google? Not sure if there are internal uses of stubs. |
|
@vksnk gentle ping |
|
Sorry for the delay, testing now. |
|
Well, there is at least one project which seems to use it pretty heavily. It doesn't look like a dead code to me, but I can try to find someone to confirm/get more details. |
stubs never really moved beyond proof-of-concept. E.g. there is no cmake support for them, and the one app that uses them has no build.
This PR removes them entirely. Opened for discussion.
Closes #8735